enarhyazzh-CNzh-TWcsdanlettlfifrkadeelhihuisiditjakolvmsnofaplptruskslessvthtrukviyi

.........-----

translate arrow

search image top2

freightHub2020 BannerSMALL

 

freightHub2020 BannerSMALL

 

XPO keeping supply chains flowing
Throughout the COVID crisis, XPO has been working ...

Read more

More fruit coming in through Rotterdam
Twice as many reefer ships with conventional cargo...

Read more

Swiss: we'll continue to cover global destinations
Swiss WorldCargo will continue to fly to different...

Read more

PayCargo launches corona credit facility
PayCargo Capital, a sister company of online payme...

Read more

Cargo demand driving return of Delta PAX service
Demand for air cargo is driving the return of Delt...

Read more

FedEx releases citizenship report
FedEx has released its 2020 Global Citizenship Rep...

Read more

Emirates SkyCargo now reaching 75 destinations weekly
Emirates SkyCargo has expanded its weekly schedule...

Read more

IMO endorses crew change strategy
IMO Secretary-General Kitack Lim has endorsed a se...

Read more

XPO keeping supply chains flowing
More fruit coming in through Rotterdam
Swiss: we'll continue to cover global destinations
PayCargo launches corona credit facility
Cargo demand driving return of Delta PAX service...
FedEx releases citizenship report
Qatar introduces Vietnam-France airbridge to aid in corona...
Emirates SkyCargo now reaching 75 destinations weekly ...
IMO endorses crew change strategy

 

 

United Cargo

 

Swiss World Cargo

 

Turkish Cargo

 

 

AA Cargo

 

PLA

 

Latest News

Qatar freighter unloading copy
29 May, 2020

WFS and Qatar Cargo keep PPE flying into French hospitals

in News
Worldwide Flight Services’ (WFS) cargo handling team in Paris has been working tirelessly…
ACS Antonov
29 May, 2020

ACS claims "invaluability" in Corona fight

in News
Air Charter Service claims that its offices in Beijing, Shanghai and Hong Kong have…
Wilhelmsen Crew
28 May, 2020

Wilhelmsen crowdfunding to support Covid affected crew

in News
Wilhelmsen Ship Management (WSM) is crowdfunding to support Mission to Seafarers (MtS),…
APMT Buenos Aires
28 May, 2020

New cold chain chamber for APMT Buenos Aires

in News
APM Terminals Buenos Aires has commissioned a new cold-store chamber. The chamber can…
Port of LA
28 May, 2020

HFT donates 11,000 pieces of PPE to Port of LA

in News
The Port of Los Angeles and Logistics Victory Los Angeles (LoVLA) have received a…
Rotterdam Drone
27 May, 2020

R'dam completes drone delivery

in News
The Port of Rotterdam has completed aerial delivery of a parts consignment by drone to…
DHL myportal
27 May, 2020

DHL launches myDHLi

in News
DHL Global Forwarding, Deutsche Post DHL Group's air and ocean freight specialist, has…
Lufthansa Cabin
27 May, 2020

Lufthansa flying 14 weekly SZX cargo flights

in News
Lufthansa Cargo is now offering 14 weekly cargo flights from and to Shenzhen (SZX). Due…
Port of Antwerp 1
26 May, 2020

April volumes down but Q1 up for Antwerp

in News
Total freight volume handled by Port of Antwerp fell in April due to the corona crisis,…

LONDON: March 07, 2016. A recent research paper by Drewry Maritime Equity Research said that a merger with fellow South Korean carrier Hanjin Shipping was a distinct possibility. What would that merged company look like?

Hyundai Merchant Marine (HMM) is fighting for its life as it seeks to restructure its debt obligations and raise money through asset sales. Last month Drewry Maritime Equity Research outlined the embattled carrier’s predicament and various attempts to stay afloat and concluded that the company will likely survive - but that a merger with compatriot Hanjin Shipping is a very real possibility.

HMM is on course to report five consecutive years of operating losses when it releases its full-year 2015 financial results. The accumulated losses in its container division alone from 2008 to the first nine months of 2015 amount to US$352 million.

As the company sells off other non-core assets, the container division is growing in importance; container sales now account for approximately three-quarters of HMM revenue, up from two-thirds in 2008.

Hanjin is no model of financial well being itself but it has at least managed to turn profits in the container market in the last two years.

The increasing reliance on the container sector puts HMM in a tough spot as the near-term outlook for the industry is negative – we expect the industry to lose in the region of US$5 billion in 2016 – meaning that the company will have to consider all options, including a merger with Hanjin.

HMM has thus far raised around US$3 billion in new capital and is looking to reduce its financial costs by renegotiating its debt and asking vessel charter parties to reduce their daily fees, many of which were agreed when shipping was booming. It is thought that creditors have tasked HMM with securing 20-30 percent cuts in charter costs as a condition for further assistance.

Despite of all of its efforts, HMM remains in a liquidity crisis that threatens its ability to meet its operational and debt commitments. The company has loans of US$334 million maturing in 2016 and US$530 million in 2017 and investors and creditors are turning skeptical about its ability to pay them back.

Previous merger talks between HMM and Hanjin were put to rest by the Korean government last year, but the debt situation in both companies is causing serious concern in local circles and could well bring them back to the table.

Both carriers sit at the bottom of Drewry’s Z-score freight operators’ financial stress index designed to give a quick reference to the financial fitness of selected service providers. While the rest of the industry has gradually improved its Z-score rating HMM has been on a long and slow decline. This, and HMM’s share performance versus other container companies makes it pretty clear that something needs to change.

A merger would propel both carriers from being on the peripheries of the Top 20 to the become the fourth largest operator in the world (before the merger of Cosco and CSCL into China Lines) with combined worldwide volumes of eight million TEU from a fleet capacity of just over 1 million TEU, giving a market share of 5.0 percent based on the current fleet.

The far larger order books of the carriers above them would see HMM/Hanjin lose some ground, but a financially stronger company might have a better chance of convincing lenders to fund a new order spree, something that HMM will struggle to do on its own.

The pairing would have a much stronger position in the key East-West trades as well as the Intra-Asia market. Based on the ships deployed in February 2016, HMM/Hanjin would have an 11.0 percent share of the Transpacific and 8.0 percent of Asia-Europe.

Such a combination could also help drive Busan, Korea’s main port, to grow quicker, which might appeal to local interests.

As we have cautioned previously, consolidation between liner operators is not a panacea to the industry’s woes because it doesn’t remove the excess number of ships, but notwithstanding that it does seem that HMM and Hanjin would stand a better chance of surviving together than they do on their own.

- Drewry is a specialist research and advisory organization providing analysis and reports for the global maritime industry.

OUTNOW

Corporate News

freightHub2020 BannerSMALL

digital-magtwitter-fw1utube-fw2loinked-fw3

- powered by Quickchilli.com -